|19||The 10th Annual Independent Show|
|3||Quarterly Telecommunications Reporting Worksheet - Form 499A|
|31||Copyright Statement of Accounts|
|1||Local Telephone Competition and Broadband Reporting - Form 477|
|30||Annual EEO Report - Form 396-C|
PITTSBURGH, August 7, 2012 - The American Cable Association urged the Federal Communications Commission to fix identified problems with the current Universal Service Fund (USF) contribution system while continuing to collect data and information on the harms and benefits of expanding the base to include broadband before deciding on the best course of action going forward.
"ACA believes the FCC should take full advantage of this opportunity to relieve smaller contributors and potential contributors of the burdens of compliance under current regulations. Meanwhile, before fundamentally changing the current regime by expanding the assessable base or altering the collection methodology, the FCC needs to gather additional and sufficient evidence," ACA President and CEO Matthew M. Polka said.
ACA set forth its views in reply comments filed August 6 with the FCC as part of the agency's broad effort to overhaul of the USF program, including the contribution system that has traditionally relied for funding on a percentage of interstate end-user revenues of telecommunications companies. This percentage, called the contribution factor, is roughly 16% and viewed by many as unsustainably high.
In terms of setting priorities, ACA urged the FCC to recognize that the current contribution regime is too complex and often produces arbitrary outcomes, resulting in onerous burdens on contributors and potential contributors. As a result, the current regime is neither sustainable nor competitively neutral. In the first round of comments, virtually all commenters agreed on the need for a simpler, less burdensome system.
ACA also stressed in its reply comments that the current system has a host of discrete problems that do not involve altering the base or methodology. To that end, ACA said the FCC should consider:
In a concern shared by other broadband communications providers, ACA said it was premature to expand the assessable base to include broadband Internet access service because it may harm adoption, innovation, and network expansion. ACA also opposed adopting an assessment that would increase with faster tiers of service.
"There are simply too many unknowns for the FCC to leap to make broadband service assessable and to make any assessment increase with higher-performing tiers of service, especially if such an assessment discourages adoption and the deployment of networks with higher-performing broadband services," Polka said.
Elsewhere, ACA urged support for allowing providers to include USF as a separately identifiable surcharge on consumers broadband bills, saying it would be useful for consumer understanding and education. But ACA said it would be confusing, expensive and complicated if broadband access providers were required to provide a detailed breakdown of how the surcharge was calculated. ACA said it made more sense to require the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC) to verify the accuracy of providers' surcharges.
About the American Cable Association
Based in Pittsburgh, the American Cable Association is a trade organization representing nearly 850 smaller and medium-sized, independent cable companies who provide broadband services for more than 7.4 million cable subscribers primarily located in rural and smaller suburban markets across America. Through active participation in the regulatory and legislative process in Washington, D.C., ACA's members work together to advance the interests of their customers and ensure the future competitiveness and viability of their business. For more information, visit http://www.americancable.org/
Please use the information below to get in touch with the American Cable Association.