PITTSBURGH, January 19, 2012 - The American Cable Association announced broad but qualified support for an array of Federal Communications Commission policies and initiatives designed to promote broadband deployment in the most costly and geographically remote regions of the country that incumbent phone carriers have elected not to serve with basic Internet access.
"The FCC has proposed a viable competitive bidding process to disburse Universal Service Fund support to ensure that the urban-rural digital divide quickly becomes a distant memory. By adopting several ACA policy recommendations, the FCC will further ensure that funding flows in the most efficient fashion to the low-cost providers meeting minimum performance standards," ACA President and CEO Matthew M. Polka said.
The FCC has identified affordable and universal broadband access as a national priority, relying on the market in most cases but on USF support to allow providers to offer service in communities with some of the most challenging economics in terms of network deployment. Last October, the FCC voted to create the Connect America Fund (CAF), which will allocate USF support to the construction and maintenance of broadband networks for the first time in the country's history.
In comments filed yesterday, ACA noted that the FCC decided that for an initial period, CAF money would automatically flow to so-called price cap phone carriers, giving them a right of first refusal on a state-by-state basis to serve their traditional study areas. To the extent these price cap carriers decline the funding in certain states, the FCC proposes a competitive auction process to allocate funding to other willing broadband providers.
In terms of funding rules, ACA strongly supports competitive bidding in the study areas of price-cap carriers, with funds awarded to the lowest bidder and contingent upon meeting a host of performance standards. This reverse auction process is clearly the most efficient mechanism to provide quality service to consumers in high-cost areas for the lowest cost to the American public, which funds the USF program through monthly fees added to landline, wireless, and VoIP phone bills. With adoption of the additional proposals submitted by ACA in its comments, the trade group is confident that the FCC can conduct successful auctions.
To that end, ACA urged the FCC that to maximize the chances of a successful CAF distribution scheme, the agency must have clear goals focused on bringing quality broadband service to high-cost areas for the lowest cost; on making it objective, with all public interest obligations well-defined and known in advance; and on ensuring competitive neutrality, especially so that the maximum number of providers may participate in the auction.
ACA stressed that in order to eliminate bureaucratic obstacles to ACA members' participation in the auctions, the FCC had to revise the Eligible Telecom Carrier (ETC) qualification process, which as currently implemented is both onerous for smaller providers and is not necessary under the CAF program. ACA believes the FCC has the authority to design the ETC designation process for broadband service and should assert exclusive jurisdiction. Such exclusive jurisdiction is appropriate to support the USF's new mission of focusing on broadband deployment and facilitating a successful competitive bidding process.
ACA added that the existing state ETC designation process is inherently burdensome because it potentially requires that carriers file multiple applications, the FCC does not control the timing of decisions, and states often impose burdensome requirements that could severely affect providers' bids in the reverse auction or performance afterward.
In its comments, ACA submitted the following recommendations for achieving an effective auction process:
lowest amount of support to provide broadband service meeting the public
interest obligations in the eligible service area;
service as determined by the forward-looking broadband cost model that
are sufficiently above the national average but are not "extremely" high cost
and where an unsupported provider does not offer 4 Mbps/1 Mbps
broadband service to at least a majority of locations;
on and challenge the determination of whether a census block is served by
an unsupported competitor;
cost model in combination with evidence from prior auctions;
high-cost census blocks in a census tract, and winners should be chosen on
a census tract basis;
and the FCC should re-evaluate the need for support and method
of support after that time;
each region should occur over multiple rounds until a clear, lowest bid is
can be determined by examining the degree by which the winning bid
varies from winning bids in similarly situated areas; and
public interest commitments designated by the FCC to at least 95
percent of locations in the service area (census tract) within two years.
About the American Cable Association
Based in Pittsburgh, the American Cable Association is a trade organization representing nearly 900 smaller and medium-sized, independent cable companies who provide broadband services for more than 7.6 million cable subscribers primarily located in rural and smaller suburban markets across America. Through active participation in the regulatory and legislative process in Washington, D.C., ACA's members work together to advance the interests of their customers and ensure the future competitiveness and viability of their business. For more information, visit http://www.americancable.org/
Please use the information below to get in touch with the American Cable Association.