Marlene H. Dortch
Federal Communications Commission
445 - 12th Street, SW
Washington, DC 20554
Re: Notice of Ex Parte Presentation - High-Cost Universal Service Support, WC Docket No. 05-337; A National Broadband Plan for Our Future, GN Docket No. 09-51; Connect America Fund, WC Docket No. 10-90
Dear Ms. Dortch:
On September 22, 2010, Ross Lieberman of the American Cable Association ("ACA"), and the undersigned, counsel to the ACA, met with the following staff of the Federal Communications Commission's Wireline Competition Bureau: Carol Mattey, Rebekah Goodheart, Patrick Halley, Amy Bender, Katie King, and Elise Kohn. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the creation of the Connect America Fund ("CAF") and the terms and conditions under which the CAF would operate. As part of an overall plan to reform the Universal Service Fund ("USF") and its individual component funds, l the ACA supports the creation of a new broadband support mechanism to drive access to broadband services in unserved areas.
Many member companies of the ACA, which include broadband providers in rural areas, believe that they could provide broadband service efficiently in unserved areas if the government provided capital grants to enable them to extend their infrastructure to premises (last mile support) and to construct or obtain middle mile links with sufficient capacity. Additional support for operations may be needed in select instances in areas where costs of service are significantly above the national average.
The ACA strongly believes that the Commission should award any broadband support on a competitively-neutral basis. This has important policy benefits. First, the quality and performance of broadband service should be greater as additional and more capable broadband providers vie to receive support. Second, the fund will be more efficient when more entities participate. Third, it will limit any government role in providing competitive advantages among broadband providers.
To ensure funds are awarded in a competitively-neutral manner, the Commission should adopt the following policies:
1. Funds should be awarded through the use of reverse auctions or some other methodology that is provider-neutral; and
2. Unserved/Underserved areas should be determined by reference to an objective government-established standard, such as census block groups, and not in a manner that favors any provider.
The ACA intends to continue to discuss with its members issues raised in this
meeting and provide further information to the Commission.
We request that this letter, which is being filed electronically, be placed in the file for the above-captioned proceeding.
Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
3050 K Street, NW
Washington, DC 20007
Tel. (202) 342-8518
Fax. (202) 342-8451
Counsel the American Cable Association
cc: C. Mattey
|100923 ACA Ex Parte re CAF.pdf||1.21 MB|
Please use the information below to get in touch with the American Cable Association.